Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753954AbdLVIl4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 03:41:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:47068 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428AbdLVIlw (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 03:41:52 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou2odCNX8sqZtGLB+GhRYREND0uiWcp26phTKJgEWSI6eGkhlBXJfzdEmjMH3W/LTDRHhuwhA== Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:41:48 +0100 From: Corentin Labbe To: Herbert Xu Cc: alexandre.torgue@st.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, davem@davemloft.net, jasowang@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, fabien.dessenne@st.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests Message-ID: <20171222084148.GA3024@Red> References: <20171129084121.9385-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20171129084121.9385-2-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20171222065724.GA27149@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171222065724.GA27149@gondor.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 957 Lines: 25 On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:57:24PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Corentin Labbe wrote: > > The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request. > > This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request. > > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe > > This is going the wrong way. We do not want to expose any of the > base types such as crypto_alg, crypto_async_request to end-users > and that includes drivers. Only core API code should touch these > base types. > Hello It's you that was suggesting using crypto_async_request: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1474434.html "The only wart with this scheme is that the drivers end up seeing struct crypto_async_request and will need to convert that to the respective request types but I couldn't really find a better way." So I wait for any suggestion. Regards Corentin Labbe