Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757572AbdLVIxa (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 03:53:30 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34688 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757482AbdLVIxY (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 03:53:24 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 013/104] crypto: deadlock between crypto_alg_sem/rtnl_mutex/genl_mutex Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:45:39 +0100 Message-Id: <20171222084610.219180759@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.1 In-Reply-To: <20171222084609.262099650@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20171222084609.262099650@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2719 Lines: 95 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Herbert Xu [ Upstream commit 8a0f5ccfb33b0b8b51de65b7b3bf342ba10b4fb6 ] On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:44:10AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > Yes, please. > Disregarding some reports is not a good way long term. Please try this patch. ---8<--- Subject: [PATCH 4.9 013/104] netlink: Annotate nlk cb_mutex by protocol Currently all occurences of nlk->cb_mutex are annotated by lockdep as a single class. This causes a false lcokdep cycle involving genl and crypto_user. This patch fixes it by dividing cb_mutex into individual classes based on the netlink protocol. As genl and crypto_user do not use the same netlink protocol this breaks the false dependency loop. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c @@ -96,6 +96,44 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nl_table); static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(nl_table_wait); +static struct lock_class_key nlk_cb_mutex_keys[MAX_LINKS]; + +static const char *const nlk_cb_mutex_key_strings[MAX_LINKS + 1] = { + "nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE", + "nlk_cb_mutex-1", + "nlk_cb_mutex-USERSOCK", + "nlk_cb_mutex-FIREWALL", + "nlk_cb_mutex-SOCK_DIAG", + "nlk_cb_mutex-NFLOG", + "nlk_cb_mutex-XFRM", + "nlk_cb_mutex-SELINUX", + "nlk_cb_mutex-ISCSI", + "nlk_cb_mutex-AUDIT", + "nlk_cb_mutex-FIB_LOOKUP", + "nlk_cb_mutex-CONNECTOR", + "nlk_cb_mutex-NETFILTER", + "nlk_cb_mutex-IP6_FW", + "nlk_cb_mutex-DNRTMSG", + "nlk_cb_mutex-KOBJECT_UEVENT", + "nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC", + "nlk_cb_mutex-17", + "nlk_cb_mutex-SCSITRANSPORT", + "nlk_cb_mutex-ECRYPTFS", + "nlk_cb_mutex-RDMA", + "nlk_cb_mutex-CRYPTO", + "nlk_cb_mutex-SMC", + "nlk_cb_mutex-23", + "nlk_cb_mutex-24", + "nlk_cb_mutex-25", + "nlk_cb_mutex-26", + "nlk_cb_mutex-27", + "nlk_cb_mutex-28", + "nlk_cb_mutex-29", + "nlk_cb_mutex-30", + "nlk_cb_mutex-31", + "nlk_cb_mutex-MAX_LINKS" +}; + static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk); static void netlink_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb); @@ -585,6 +623,9 @@ static int __netlink_create(struct net * } else { nlk->cb_mutex = &nlk->cb_def_mutex; mutex_init(nlk->cb_mutex); + lockdep_set_class_and_name(nlk->cb_mutex, + nlk_cb_mutex_keys + protocol, + nlk_cb_mutex_key_strings[protocol]); } init_waitqueue_head(&nlk->wait);