Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271705AbTGRFmZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 01:42:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271707AbTGRFmZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 01:42:25 -0400 Received: from mail.cpt.sahara.co.za ([196.41.29.142]:19183 "EHLO workshop.saharact.lan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271705AbTGRFmY (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 01:42:24 -0400 Subject: Re: devfsd From: Martin Schlemmer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ro0tSiEgE LKML , KML In-Reply-To: <20030717165603.A8369@infradead.org> References: <20030715214610.GA21238@core.citynetwireless.net> <20030717165603.A8369@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1058507844.13515.1579.camel@workshop.saharacpt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3- Date: 18 Jul 2003 07:57:24 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 25 On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 17:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:46:10PM -0500, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote: > > Why is devfsd still tagged as EXPERIMENTAL even in 2.6.0-test1 ? Is > > there something wrong with it, or has it just not been changed? > > It's still there because we don't have a BROKEN tag. > Apart from obvious/known inefficiencies, it works fine over here :P Any way, if you are serious, what make you consider it broken (no, not talking about personal preferences/phobias 8) Cheers, -- Martin Schlemmer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/