Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756735AbdLVMO2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:14:28 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:41496 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756131AbdLVMOW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:14:22 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,440,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="14825250" Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:48:17 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Fix event mapping for TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 Message-ID: <20171222121817.GV18649@localhost> References: <20171219105116.24335-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171219105116.24335-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 581 Lines: 15 On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > From: Vignesh R > > Register layout of a typical TPCC_EVT_MUX_M_N register is such that the > lowest numbered event is at the lowest byte address and highest numbered > event at highest byte address. But TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register layout is > different, in that the lowest numbered event is at the highest address > and highest numbered event is at the lowest address. Therefore, modify > ti_am335x_xbar_write() to handle TPCC_EVT_MUX_60_63 register > accordingly. Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod