Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 07:33:19 -0700
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, geert@linux-m68k.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PATCH: typo bits
Message-Id: <20030718073319.37d7863f.rddunlap@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030718152947.B3019@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0307181221390.22944-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>
	<1058528165.19558.3.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
	<20030718152947.B3019@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
Organization: OSDL
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1085
Lines: 28

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:29:47 +0200 Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl> wrote:

| On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:36:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
| 
| > > > - * It's now support isochronous mode and more effective than hc_sl811.o
| > > > + * It's now support isosynchronous mode and more effective than hc_sl811.o
| > > 
| > > I thought the correct term was `isochronous'...
| > 
| > Perhaps someone can clarify - however isochornus is definitely wrong either way
| 
| You are the native English speaker here. Isosynchronous is (was?) not an
| English word.
| 
| Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices.
| Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode.

It does?  I can't find it in the main USB 2.0 spec.
It discusses isochronous, which is what I would prefer to see,
regardless of the USB spec.

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/