Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752837AbdL1ITF (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2017 03:19:05 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:45045 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752686AbdL1ITE (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Dec 2017 03:19:04 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouOeNIxsCra+FEPg/CHdbbkGGWoCYbwojvpCoI0VDfQKmBS5ejKnyU2Fl/SOnHqAI8r/NROvQ== From: Lukas Bulwahn X-Google-Original-From: Lukas Bulwahn Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 09:18:52 +0100 (CET) To: Josh Poimboeuf cc: Lukas Bulwahn , Nick Desaulniers , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix clang enum conversion warning In-Reply-To: <20171227173819.67iidrynd7jmmbmy@treble> Message-ID: References: <20171227173819.67iidrynd7jmmbmy@treble> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 19 On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > The patch from Lukas was the first one I received, so that's the one I > used. I rewrote the commit msg for clarity and added my SOB and sent it > to Ingo for merging. > Josh, Ingo, the first patch I sent to Josh must have been a v0, which I probably did not even checkpatch.pl. It still was with a github-style commit message (for nice formatting in a github discussion), not with a kernel-style commit message. So I would suggest to take the patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10103977/ and add Josh's Signed-off, and Nicholas' and Nick's Reviewed-by.