Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933186AbeAAOqc (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 1 Jan 2018 09:46:32 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46784 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933156AbeAAOq2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jan 2018 09:46:28 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Calvin Owens , Michael Chan , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.14 108/146] bnxt_en: Fix sources of spurious netpoll warnings Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 15:38:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20180101140139.632147656@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.1 In-Reply-To: <20180101140123.743014891@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180101140123.743014891@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Calvin Owens [ Upstream commit 2edbdb3159d6f6bd3a9b6e7f789f2b879699a519 ] After applying 2270bc5da3497945 ("bnxt_en: Fix netpoll handling") and 903649e718f80da2 ("bnxt_en: Improve -ENOMEM logic in NAPI poll loop."), we still see the following WARN fire: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1875170 at net/core/netpoll.c:165 netpoll_poll_dev+0x15a/0x160 bnxt_poll+0x0/0xd0 exceeded budget in poll Call Trace: [] dump_stack+0x4d/0x70 [] __warn+0xd3/0xf0 [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60 [] netpoll_poll_dev+0x15a/0x160 [] netpoll_send_skb_on_dev+0x168/0x250 [] netpoll_send_udp+0x2dc/0x440 [] write_ext_msg+0x20e/0x250 [] call_console_drivers.constprop.23+0xa5/0x110 [] console_unlock+0x339/0x5b0 [] vprintk_emit+0x2c8/0x450 [] vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 [] printk+0x48/0x50 [] edac_raw_mc_handle_error+0x563/0x5c0 [edac_core] [] edac_mc_handle_error+0x42b/0x6e0 [edac_core] [] sbridge_mce_output_error+0x410/0x10d0 [sb_edac] [] sbridge_check_error+0xac/0x130 [sb_edac] [] edac_mc_workq_function+0x3c/0x90 [edac_core] [] process_one_work+0x19b/0x480 [] worker_thread+0x6a/0x520 [] kthread+0xe4/0x100 [] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40 This happens because we increment rx_pkts on -ENOMEM and -EIO, resulting in rx_pkts > 0. Fix this by only bumping rx_pkts if we were actually given a non-zero budget. Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens Acked-by: Michael Chan Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c @@ -1875,7 +1875,7 @@ static int bnxt_poll_work(struct bnxt *b * here forever if we consistently cannot allocate * buffers. */ - else if (rc == -ENOMEM) + else if (rc == -ENOMEM && budget) rx_pkts++; else if (rc == -EBUSY) /* partial completion */ break; @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static int bnxt_poll_nitroa0(struct napi cpu_to_le32(RX_CMPL_ERRORS_CRC_ERROR); rc = bnxt_rx_pkt(bp, bnapi, &raw_cons, &event); - if (likely(rc == -EIO)) + if (likely(rc == -EIO) && budget) rx_pkts++; else if (rc == -EBUSY) /* partial completion */ break;