Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268417AbTGSKIp (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 06:08:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268462AbTGSKIp (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 06:08:45 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:2176 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268417AbTGSKIo (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 06:08:44 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:33:05 +0100 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200307191033.h6JAX5IP000918@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: Bitkeeper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm@bitmover.com, rms@gnu.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 20 > If everyone spent the time replacing bitkeeper instead of beating up > Larry they'd get a lot further. Linux isn't the only free operating system in existance, and although BK seems to suit the requirements of a lot of Linux developers, that doesn't mean that it meets the requirements of other free OS development teams. I strongly suspect that we'll see a free SCM developed after a few more years of HURD development, for example. Doesn't mean we'll switch to it, though, we haven't switched to my bug database, have we? :-). John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/