Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752975AbeABIyq (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 03:54:46 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:41431 "EHLO mail-it0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751492AbeABIyn (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 03:54:43 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotfusIs7Eg2vWlCQSCu/CHIPmQi2TWUPXFPpYT5qItofgQKE9MPqFmrrji2sSkSUo76Q4NYBQ== Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:24:36 +0530 From: Aishwarya Pant To: Tomi Valkeinen , Jonathan Corbet , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Julia Lawall , Greg KH Subject: Documentation: OMAPDSS: move sysfs documentation to ABI Message-ID: <20180102085436.GA32637@mordor.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi In Documentation/arm/OMAP/DSS, there is a description of the DSS and FB sysfs interfaces which could be moved to Documentation/ABI. Would such a change be useful? I can see that the sysfs interface is still in testing. The ABI documentation format looks like the following: What: (the full sysfs path of the attribute) Date: (date of creation) KernelVersion: (kernel version it first showed up in) Contact: (primary contact) Description: (long description on usage) I am doing this in an exercise to move sysfs ABI interfaces (which are documented) to their right place i.e. in Documentation/ABI along with the rest. Aishwarya