Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:03:55 +0100
From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Message-Id: <200307191503.h6JF3tac002376@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
To: john@grabjohn.com, lkml@lrsehosting.com
Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm@bitmover.com,
       rms@gnu.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1017
Lines: 24

> >> If everyone spent the time replacing bitkeeper instead of beating up
> >> Larry they'd get a lot further.
> > Linux isn't the only free operating system in existance, and although BK
> > seems to suit the requirements of a lot of Linux developers, that
> > doesn't mean that it meets the requirements of other free OS
> > development teams.
> > I strongly suspect that we'll see a free SCM developed after a few more
> > years of HURD development, for example.
> > Doesn't mean we'll switch to it, though, we haven't switched to my bug
> > database, have we?  :-).
> > John.
>
> Given that large chunks of HURD come from Linux, please refer to it as
> Linux/HURD.

What HURD code comes from Linux?  GNU/Mach uses code from Linux, but
not HURD as far as I know.

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/