Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752226AbeABMMm (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 07:12:42 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44776 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751706AbeABMMl (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 07:12:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:12:37 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Zi Yan , Naoya Horiguchi , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton , Andrea Reale , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm, numa: rework do_pages_move Message-ID: <20180102121237.GC25397@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20171207143401.GK20234@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171208161559.27313-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20171208161559.27313-2-mhocko@kernel.org> <2e467ad3-a443-bde4-afa2-664bca57914f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e467ad3-a443-bde4-afa2-664bca57914f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Tue 02-01-18 16:55:46, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 12/08/2017 09:45 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > do_pages_move is supposed to move user defined memory (an array of > > addresses) to the user defined numa nodes (an array of nodes one for > > each address). The user provided status array then contains resulting > > numa node for each address or an error. The semantic of this function is > > little bit confusing because only some errors are reported back. Notably > > migrate_pages error is only reported via the return value. This patch > > It does report back the migration failures as well. In new_page_node > there is '*result = &pm->status' which going forward in unmap_and_move > will hold migration error or node ID of the new page. > > newpage = get_new_page(page, private, &result); > ............ > if (result) { > if (rc) > *result = rc; > else > *result = page_to_nid(newpage); > } > This is true, except the user will not get this information. Have a look how we do not copy status on error up in the do_pages_move layer. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs