Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751335AbeABUIc (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:08:32 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:32984 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751069AbeABUIa (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:08:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 21:08:36 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Neal Cardwell Cc: David Miller , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Yuchung Cheng , Soheil Hassas Yeganeh , Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/75] 4.9.74-stable review Message-ID: <20180102200836.GA8522@kroah.com> References: <20180101140056.475827799@linuxfoundation.org> <20180102.133200.293358868256951664.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Neal Cardwell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:32 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Neal Cardwell > > Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:57:59 -0500 > > > >> On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> wrote: > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.74 release. > >>> There are 75 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >>> let me know. > >>> > >>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan 3 14:00:03 UTC 2018. > >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. > >>> > >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.74-rc1.gz > >>> or in the git tree and branch at: > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y > >>> and the diffstat can be found below. > >> > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >> In looking at the 4.9 and 4.14 patches yesterday, I noticed there were > >> two TCP BBR fixes that made it into 4.14 but not 4.9. Doing an > >> inventory of the TCP BBR fixes, AFAICT we have: > >> > >> c589e69b508d tcp_bbr: record "full bw reached" decision in new > >> full_bw_reached bit > >> - in 4.9 and 4.14 (great) > >> > >> 2f6c498e4f15 tcp_bbr: reset full pipe detection on loss recovery undo > >> - in 4.14 (but not 4.9) > >> > >> 600647d467c6 tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling on loss recovery undo > >> - in 4.14 (but not 4.9) > >> > >> Lacking the second and third patches in 4.9 will not cause any new > >> problems, but it will miss out on some nice fixes. If it's possible to > >> get 2f6c498e4f15 and 600647d467c6 either into 4.9.74 or 4.9.75, I > >> would be very grateful. > > > > These were not straight-forward to backport and I felt the risk outweighed > > the gains. > > > > If you want to do the backport yourself and you feel confident in it, > > feel free. > > Thanks, Greg and David. Looks like these 2 patches will cherry-pick > cleanly if cherry-picked in the following sequence, on top of > 4.9.74-rc1, which already has 6c9e73ef9aa7 ("tcp_bbr: record "full bw > reached" decision in new full_bw_reached bit"): > > $ git checkout linux-stable-rc/linux-4.9.y > > $ git cherry-pick 2f6c498e4f15 > Performing inexact rename detection: 100% (17803152/17803152), done. > [detached HEAD 0982234c57e1] tcp_bbr: reset full pipe detection on > loss recovery undo > Date: Thu Dec 7 12:43:31 2017 -0500 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > $ git cherry-pick 600647d467c6 > Performing inexact rename detection: 100% (17803152/17803152), done. > [detached HEAD 7e866eccd083] tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth > sampling on loss recovery undo > Date: Thu Dec 7 12:43:32 2017 -0500 > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > $ git log --oneline --decorate | head -3 > 7e866eccd083 (HEAD) tcp_bbr: reset long-term bandwidth sampling on > loss recovery undo > 0982234c57e1 tcp_bbr: reset full pipe detection on loss recovery undo > 79070be7f1ae (linux-stable-rc/linux-4.9.y) Linux 4.9.74-rc1 > > I verified that this compiles without warnings, and boots, and BBR works. > > Shall I prepare another version of these 2 patches, or do we think > this recipe will be sufficient? (Sorry I am not more familiar with the > backport-to-stable process.) That works, those two patches are now queued up for the next stable release, thanks! greg k-h