Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751168AbeABUps convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:45:48 -0500 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:43255 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751106AbeABUpq (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:45:46 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_serdev: Init hci_uart proto_lock to avoid oops From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 21:45:44 +0100 Cc: Lukas Wunner , Rob Herring , Johan Hovold , Ronald Tschalaer , Sumit Semwal , "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: References: <20171116213045.GA17506@wunner.de> <20171116214504.GB17506@wunner.de> <25BE9D66-9609-42D0-8A83-E15758FA3A1B@holtmann.org> To: John Stultz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi John, >>>> John Stultz reports a boot time crash with the HiKey board (which uses >>>> hci_serdev) occurring in hci_uart_tx_wakeup(). That function is >>>> contained in hci_ldisc.c, but also called from the newer hci_serdev.c. >>>> It acquires the proto_lock in struct hci_uart and it turns out that we >>>> forgot to init the lock in the serdev code path, thus causing the crash. >>>> >>>> John bisected the crash to commit 67d2f8781b9f ("Bluetooth: hci_ldisc: >>>> Allow sleeping while proto locks are held"), but the issue was present >>>> before and the commit merely exposed it. (Perhaps by luck, the crash >>>> did not occur with rwlocks.) >>>> >>>> Init the proto_lock in the serdev code path to avoid the oops. >>>> >> [snip] >>> patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree. >> >> Sorry to be a nuisance if its just a timing thing, but I wanted to >> follow up on this just to make sure it didn't fall through the cracks, >> as I noticed w/ -rc3 it hasn't landed yet. > > Happy new year all, > Just wanted to send another ping on this as it seems it hasn't made > it into -rc6. Did this get missed as being tagged as a (at least > functional) regression fix? since it wasn’t marked as urgent fix, it never went on the path to -rc. It is on the path for the next release. And then can be included in -stable if needed. Regards Marcel