Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270459AbTGSSa7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:30:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270466AbTGSSa6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:30:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:58584 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270459AbTGSSav (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:30:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:45:19 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Christoph Hellwig , Ga?l Le Mignot , Larry McVoy , Christian Reichert , John Bradford , lkml@lrsehosting.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rms@gnu.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD Message-ID: <20030719184519.GB24197@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Christoph Hellwig , Ga?l Le Mignot , Larry McVoy , Christian Reichert , John Bradford , lkml@lrsehosting.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rms@gnu.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <200307191503.h6JF3tac002376@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <1058626962.30424.6.camel@stargate> <20030719172311.GA23246@work.bitmover.com> <20030719181249.GA24197@work.bitmover.com> <20030719194123.A16317@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030719194123.A16317@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0, required 7) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1178 Lines: 26 On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 07:41:23PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 11:12:49AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > > The microkernel part of any reasonable microkernel is tiny. > > And who says Mach is a reasonable microkernel :) Yup, more like a maxikernel :) That was my reaction on reading the code years ago and it hasn't changed. I used to know one of the main guys who did the QNX microkernel (Dan Hildebrandt, RIP 1998) and he talked about how a real microkernel was never touched by more than 3 people and each of them spent as much time removing stuff as adding it. Mach is kinda on the bloated side, I always questioned the wisdom of the GNU HURD being based on Mach, seemed like a bad call. But then, unless you have an extremely well controlled dev team, any micro kernel is a bad call, it's going to bloat out. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/