Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270476AbTGSSuj (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:50:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270477AbTGSSuj (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:50:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:15065 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270476AbTGSSuh (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:50:37 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:05:31 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Bitkeeper Message-ID: <20030719190531.GB24698@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <1058560325.2662.31.camel@localhost> <20030719184246.GF7452@lug-owl.de> <20030719184944.GC24197@work.bitmover.com> <20030719185737.GG7452@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030719185737.GG7452@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0, required 7) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2021 Lines: 50 > Basically, cvsps sucks off the rlog messages and compares any check-in Hmm. I would guess that makes rlog very happy. And sleepy :) > texts / times of any files to find out what has been checked-in with a > single check-in. That is then called a patchset (cvs_ps_). With some > command line arguments, it'll then output the check-in text as well as a > unified diff. We're looking at getting some seperate bandwidth for bkbits.net and turning on the patch feature of BK/Web. Then you'll be able to do a wget http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5/gnupatch@1.5234 and get something like the following. I suspect this is better than cvsps and it will work for all repositories on bkbits.net, not just the mainline one. Is that good enough for what you want? The format below repeats for each file in the changeset. ===== man/man1/bk-config-etc.1 1.23.1.1 vs 1.26 ===== 02/05/16 13:44:09 wscott@wscott1.homeip.net 1.24 +16 -0 Document 'trust_window' parameter 02/10/03 11:24:15 wscott@desk.wscott1.homeip.net 1.23.1.2 +9 -0 Docuement the BK_CONFIG environmental variable --- 1.23.1.1/man/man1/bk-config-etc.1 Tue Sep 17 12:33:59 2002 +++ 1.26/man/man1/bk-config-etc.1 Thu Oct 3 09:24:49 2002 @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ (/etc/BitKeeper/etc/config) then that setting will override any matching key in local config files. .LP +Also configuration entries can be overridden with the +.B BK_CONFIG +environmental variable. That variable can contain a list of key:value +pairs seperated by semicolons. For example: +.DS +.BR BK_CONFIG =\c +.IR key1 : value2 ; key2 : value2 ; key3 : value3\c +.DE +.LP Minimum content requirements for the BitKeeper/etc/config file -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/