Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751358AbeACCwQ (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 21:52:16 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:43798 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751140AbeACCwO (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 21:52:14 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 1/1] ima: re-introduce own integrity cache lock From: Mimi Zohar To: "Darrick J. Wong" , Dmitry Kasatkin Cc: linux-integrity , linux-security-module , Jan Kara , "Theodore Ts'o" , Chris Mason , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Kasatkin , xfs Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 21:52:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180103014048.GE5146@magnolia> References: <20180103014048.GE5146@magnolia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18010302-0020-0000-0000-000003E5FF92 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18010302-0021-0000-0000-000042780CF1 Message-Id: <1514947923.3493.2.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-01-03_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801030036 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 17:40 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > [might as well cc linux-xfs] > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:22:37AM +0200, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could I ask FS maintainers to test IMA with this patch additionally > > and provide ack/tested. > > We tested but may be you have and some special testing. > > Super-late to this party, but unless xfstests has automated tests to > set up IMA on top of an existing filesystem then I most likely have no > idea /how/ to test IMA. I did a quick grep of xfstests git and I don't > see anything IMA-related. Back in June I posted a simple xfstests IMA-appraisal test (https://ma rc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149703820814885&w=4). Mimi