Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270536AbTGSUPc (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:15:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270537AbTGSUPc (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:15:32 -0400 Received: from filesrv1.system-techniques.com ([199.33.245.55]:64135 "EHLO filesrv1.baby-dragons.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270536AbTGSUP1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:15:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:30:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" To: Mark Mielke cc: Linux Kernel Maillist Subject: SCM file system (Was Re: Bitkeeper) In-Reply-To: <20030719161725.GD17587@mark.mielke.cc> Message-ID: References: <200307191600.h6JG0OZd002669@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <20030719161725.GD17587@mark.mielke.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1968 Lines: 33 Hello Mark All , (I hate continuing this thread But) A thought just (re-)occured to me that for those people who -really- need it . What about an SCM file system ? Thoughts , anger , complancency ? Twys , JimL On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Mark Mielke wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 05:00:24PM +0100, John Bradford wrote: > > > Any investment into writing a new source management > > > system would be better served by improving the linux source code. > > What happens if somebody develops a really good versioned filesystem > > for Linux, would it not get merged, because the linux kernel would > > then contain SCM-like functionality? > One day, when it happens, we'll see what ripple effects it has. > In most cases, however, I suspect that a versioned file system will never > be a replacement for a good source management system. The lines could become > blurred, but the 'good versioned file system' might take the form a kernel > module that allowed SCM systems to plug into it, at which point, Bit Keeper > might plug into it, and everybody would be happy. I doubt you want to put > merge manager functionality into the kernel, or many of the other components > of a good source management system. The storage and access is one of the > lesser concerns. Bit Keeper uses similar storage and access methods as > SCCS, does it not? -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS | | Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux | | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/