Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751814AbeADAij (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 3 Jan 2018 19:38:39 -0500 Received: from www.llwyncelyn.cymru ([82.70.14.225]:42150 "EHLO fuzix.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751408AbeADAig (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2018 19:38:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 00:38:24 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , dwmw@amazon.co.uk, Tim Chen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel Message-ID: <20180104003824.6e5e038e@alans-desktop> In-Reply-To: References: <20180103230934.15788-1-andi@firstfloor.org> <20180104000927.co5umvfzfwliqvqt@two.firstfloor.org> <20180104001501.3jof7zkrfkehnd3r@two.firstfloor.org> <20180104002916.3ff66581@alans-desktop> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: > So you say, that we finally need a perl interpreter in the kernel to do > alternative patching? No but for weird cases like that gcc -S perl -e as does work. Alan