Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:49:43 +0100
From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Message-Id: <200307201349.h6KDnhXj002101@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
To: beef@nexuslabs.com, lloy0076@adam.com.au
Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, john@grabjohn.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       lkml@lrsehosting.com, lm@bitmover.com, rms@gnu.org, tytso@mit.edu,
       Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 552
Lines: 13

>  * bitkeeper (because it's a better system than anything open source) vs
>    cvs wars are tedious

This discussion is nothing to do with Bit Keeper, (anymore).  We are
discussing what parts of the Hurd and GNU Mach contain code derived
from Linux.  That's actually quite interesting, and on-topic.

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/