Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267419AbTGTQb0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:31:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267425AbTGTQbZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:31:25 -0400 Received: from pasky.ji.cz ([213.226.226.138]:24563 "HELO machine.sinus.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267419AbTGTQbL (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:31:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:46:09 +0200 From: Petr Baudis To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: "David S. Miller" , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, greearb@candelatech.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org Message-ID: <20030720164609.GH12132@pasky.ji.cz> Mail-Followup-To: "Martin J. Bligh" , "David S. Miller" , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, greearb@candelatech.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com References: <20030629.151302.28804993.davem@redhat.com> <17280000.1056940541@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17280000.1056940541@[10.10.2.4]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2459 Lines: 56 Dear diary, on Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:35:44AM CEST, I got a letter, where "Martin J. Bligh" told me, that... > --"David S. Miller" wrote (on Sunday, June 29, 2003 15:13:02 -0700): ..snip.. > > The greatest tools in the world aren't useful if people don't want > > to use them. > > > > Nobody wants to use tools unless it melds easily into their existing > > daily routine. This means it must be email based and it must somehow > > work via the existing mailing lists. It sounds a lot like what I'm > > advocating except that there's some robot monitoring the list > > postings. > > Agreed, the interface could be better - we're working on it. It won't > be totally change free, but it could be better integrated. Feedback is > very useful, though it helps a lot of you can pinpoint what's the > underlying issue rather than "this is crap". Better email integration > is top of the list, starting with sending stuff out to multiple people > when filed, not a single bottleneck point. Actually, it's not difficult to make Bugzilla to do things like sending out ALL bugs updates emails to certain email adress(es), on a global basis or per-module. Also, it is relatively easy to make Bugzilla _accept_ bugs updates through email, from additional comments (+ attachments) to status/priority/target/... changes. It works quite nicely for us (ELinks) and it took just few hours to set up properly (we had to touch the BZ sources, but just a little, the rest are external support scripts). What is missing is some email interface for querying the database (shouldn't be difficult to do, though), but if you just want to file/update bugs, all you need is to: * have the new bugs posted on the mailing list * keep bugzilla in the cc list through the whole thread, as long as it's relevant at least ;-) * don't remove [Bug 12345] from the subject If Martin would like some know-how about how to set things up, I could share what we've done with him. Kind regards, -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis . Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away. -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery . Stuff: http://pasky.ji.cz/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/