Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267488AbTGTQo5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:44:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267504AbTGTQo5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:44:57 -0400 Received: from [200.104.148.52] ([200.104.148.52]:14722 "EHLO sleipnir.valparaiso.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267488AbTGTQo4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:44:56 -0400 Message-Id: <200307201659.h6KGxX912617@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> To: John Bradford cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:49:43 +0100." <200307201349.h6KDnhXj002101@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> X-mailer: MH [Version 6.8.4] X-charset: ISO_8859-1 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:59:33 -0400 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 27 [Cc: list chopped down to size] John Bradford said: [...] > This discussion is nothing to do with Bit Keeper, (anymore). That stuff is wildly off-topic. > We are > discussing what parts of the Hurd and GNU Mach contain code derived > from Linux. That's actually quite interesting, and on-topic. Why? Are you planing to take anything from Hurd? Or complain that they (legally!) are taking GPLed code and use it elsewhere? In the fist case, discussion about the _technical_ merit of the code to swipe is on-topic, all else isn't. The second case is none of your business, (unless you wrote the code and did not GPL it). -- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/