Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751544AbeAECRi (ORCPT + 1 other); Thu, 4 Jan 2018 21:17:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:44888 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751307AbeAECRg (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2018 21:17:36 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos5/HIYAvF9rDxrhJykVZ5oTCrxbPTcOGjFnNurcqpElU6uZtnZQ5bxmWgtDZnbvZ5G4vaO0IcHoUOjEOixj2w= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Chiu Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:17:35 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: r8169 take too long to complete driver initialization To: nic_swsd@realtek.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Linux Upstreaming Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Chris Chiu wrote: > Hi, > We've hit a suspend/resume issue on a Acer desktop caused by r8169 > driver. The dmseg > https://gist.github.com/mschiu77/b741849b5070281daaead8dfee312d1a > shows it's still in msleep() within a mutex lock. > After looking into the code, it's caused by the > rtl8168ep_stop_cmac() which is waiting 100 seconds for > rtl_ocp_tx_cond. The following dmesg states that the r8169 driver is > loaded. > > [ 20.270526] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded > > But it takes > 100 seconds to get the following messages > > [ 140.400223] r8169 0000:02:00.0 (unnamed net_device) > (uninitialized): rtl_ocp_tx_cond == 1 (loop: 2000, delay: 50). > [ 140.413294] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: RTL8168ep/8111ep at > 0xffffb16c80db1000, f8:0f:41:ea:74:0d, XID 10200800 IRQ 46 > [ 140.413297] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9200 > bytes, tx checksumming: ko] > > So any trial to suspend the machine during this period would always > get device/resource busy message then abort. Is this rtl_ocp_tx_cond > necessary? Because the ethernet is still working and I don't see any > problem. I don't know it should be considered normal or not. Please > let me know if any more information required. Thanks > > Chris gentle ping, cheers.