Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751441AbeAEJOs (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 04:14:48 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57951 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751342AbeAEJOq (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 04:14:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:14:43 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Andrew Morton , Zi Yan , Naoya Horiguchi , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Vlastimil Babka , Andrea Reale , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, numa: rework do_pages_move Message-ID: <20180105091443.GJ2801@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180103082555.14592-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20180103082555.14592-2-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Fri 05-01-18 09:22:22, Anshuman Khandual wrote: [...] > Hi Michal, > > After slightly modifying your test case (like fixing the page size for > powerpc and just doing simple migration from node 0 to 8 instead of the > interleaving), I tried to measure the migration speed with and without > the patches on mainline. Its interesting.... > > 10000 pages | 100000 pages > -------------------------- > Mainline 165 ms 1674 ms > Mainline + first patch (move_pages) 191 ms 1952 ms > Mainline + all three patches 146 ms 1469 ms > > Though overall it gives performance improvement, some how it slows > down migration after the first patch. Will look into this further. What are you measuring actually? All pages migrated to the same node? Do you have any profiles? How stable are the results? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs