Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751127AbeAEKVN (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 05:21:13 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:45143 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbeAEKVK (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 05:21:10 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovDIpJbe3W6t89Whr44GGnXeHjdMU8b2Hc0SaGlYtQP6izaLCG58S/OMfuSmjymwNh0l6r5wQ== Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:21:05 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Mark Salter , Tony Luck , David Howells , Yoshinori Sato , Guan Xuetao , Borislav Petkov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Vineet Gupta , Fengguang Wu , Steven Rostedt , LKML , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] replace print_symbol() with printk()-s Message-ID: <20180105102105.GB471@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20171211125025.2270-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20180105100300.j3svmcvvpfe2iows@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180105100300.j3svmcvvpfe2iows@pathway.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On (01/05/18 11:03), Petr Mladek wrote: [..] > Anyway, print_symbol() is an old weird API and it would be nice > to eventually get rid of it. I could take this patches into > printk.git. no objections from my side if the patch set will go through the printk tree. shall we wait for ACKs or can we move on? do you plan to land it in 4.16? > Would you mind if I change the commit messages to something like?: > > print_symbol() is an old weird API. It has been > obsoleted by printk() and %pS format specifier. I wouldn't. let's drop the "weird" part. other than that looks good to me. -ss