Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751314AbeAELcS (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 06:32:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:42149 "EHLO mail-wm0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750907AbeAELcR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 06:32:17 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouc4dxo6LZ5Ezf1gN/k6Zjg85wU7wMHyq8SBmDzoXIyiYKzjvjf/cAcfvmIjmHuWdWIxYNPPg== Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] IBRS patch series To: "Van De Ven, Arjan" , Linus Torvalds , David Woodhouse Cc: Tim Chen , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Greg KH , "Hansen, Dave" , Andrea Arcangeli , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1515093549.29312.11.camel@infradead.org> <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A56A873@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:32:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A56A873@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On 04/01/2018 22:22, Van De Ven, Arjan wrote: > this is about a level of paranoia you are comfortable with. > > Retpoline on Skylake raises the bar for the issue enormously, but > there are a set of corner cases that exist and that are not trivial > to prove you dealt with them. > > personally I am comfortable with retpoline on Skylake, but I would > like to have IBRS as an opt in for the paranoid. > IBRS actually seems to perform more than decently on Skylake with the microcode updates we're shipping in RHEL---much more so than Broadwell or Haswell. Can you confirm that this is expected? Paolo