Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751658AbeAENec (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 08:34:32 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58910 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751067AbeAENea (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 08:34:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 14:34:34 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Guenter Roeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Tao Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/37] 4.4.110-stable review Message-ID: <20180105133434.GC12036@kroah.com> References: <20180103195056.837404126@linuxfoundation.org> <20180104234555.GA4143@roeck-us.net> <1515127074.7787.12.camel@gmx.de> <20180105121701.GD19551@kroah.com> <1515157397.7787.24.camel@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1515157397.7787.24.camel@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:03:17PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:17 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:37:54AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 15:45 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > > > The crash part of this problem may be solved with the following patch > > > > (thanks to Hugh for the hint). There is still another problem, though - > > > > with this patch applied, the qemu session aborts with "VCPU Shutdown > > > > request", whatever that means. > > > > > > The crash part is not fixed by your patch here, w/wo I get this, and it > > > is PTI, as virgin 109 boots/works with identical everything else. ?My > > > shiny new PTI equipped enterprise 4.4 RT kernels also boot/work fine, > > > which seems a bit odd.. and not particularly comforting. > > > > Might I ask _what_ enterprise 4.4 kernels you are trying here? This > > should be the identical set to what is in the SLES12 tree, which worries > > me a lot... > > SLE12-SP[23]-RT, currently 4.4.104 based. Parent trees boot fine in the > vm too. I thought perhaps it was a config difference, but seems not, > 4.4.110-rc1 built with as close to enterprise config as you can get > blows up the same as my light config. Ok, we found two patches that were missing in 4.4-stable that were in the SLES12 tree (thanks to Jamie Iles), now I only have 19k more to sift through :) I should probably do an "interm" release to get people to be able to sync up to a common place easier for testing, dealing with patch sets and random emails saying different git ids is not easy for anyone. thanks, greg k-h