Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756181AbeAHJVH (ORCPT <rfc822;ralf@linux-mips.org> + 1 other);
        Mon, 8 Jan 2018 04:21:07 -0500
Received: from forward4j.cmail.yandex.net ([5.255.227.22]:34015 "EHLO
        forward4j.cmail.yandex.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755900AbeAHJVF (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 8 Jan 2018 04:21:05 -0500
Authentication-Results: mxback11g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com.tr
From: Ozgur <ozgur@goosey.org>
Envelope-From: okaratas@yandex.com.tr
To: Aishwarya Pant <aishpant@gmail.com>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@idt.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180108090252.GA14572@mordor.localdomain>
References: <20180108083822.GA8353@mordor.localdomain>
         <1498451515401892@web21g.yandex.ru> <20180108090252.GA14572@mordor.localdomain>
Subject: Re: Documentation: rapidio: move sysfs interface to ABI
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <1132081515403259@web31o.yandex.ru>
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 12:20:59 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>



08.01.2018, 12:03, "Aishwarya Pant" <aishpant@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:58:12AM +0300, Ozgur wrote:
>>  08.01.2018, 11:38, "Aishwarya Pant" <aishpant@gmail.com>:
>>  > Hi
>>
>>  Hello,
>>
>>  > In Documentation/rapidio/sysfs.txt, there is a description of the sysfs
>>  > interface which could be moved to Documentation/ABI (as a bus interface under
>>  > testing).
>>  >
>>  > Would such a change be useful?
>>  >
>>  > The ABI documentation format looks like the following:
>>  >
>>  > What: (the full sysfs path of the attribute)
>>  > Date: (date of creation)
>>  > KernelVersion: (kernel version it first showed up in)
>>  > Contact: (primary contact)
>>  > Description: (long description on usage)
>>
>>  Please you make the change you want after send your patch it diff format, right?
>>  I think a better decision can be made.
>
> This is the idea. If this change is acceptable, then I can make a patch and send
> it for review.

Hm,

I think firstly you should send the patch then everybody checked and change is decided.


Regards

Ozgur

> Aishwarya
>
>>  > I am doing this in an exercise to move sysfs ABI interfaces (which are
>>  > documented) to their right place i.e. in Documentation/ABI along with the rest.
>>  >
>>  > Aishwarya
>>
>>  Regards
>>
>>  Ozgur