Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756350AbeAHJjq (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 04:39:46 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:51824 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756054AbeAHJjp (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 04:39:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] apparmor fix for 4.15-rc7 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: LKLM References: <59407ee2-6413-7a8a-02d4-492bd3276a84@canonical.com> From: John Johansen Organization: Canonical Message-ID: <1ce75bd1-35fe-fd01-5202-811d250adccf@canonical.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 01:39:41 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On 01/07/2018 11:40 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 5:53 AM, John Johansen > wrote: >> >> can you please pull the following regression fix for apparmor. > > Pulled. > > I do note that you still don't seem to have any signatures on your key. > > You've used it for a couple of months, any chance to get somebody to sign it? > Strange, it should have signatures from Greg KH, Kees Cook, James Bottomly Serge Hallyn, and several others in the kernel community Locally the gpg --list-sigs looks good, but I won't claim to really know gpg, and maybe there is something messed up. I'll poke at and see if I can't figure out what is up. If needed I can certainly grab Kees Cook and maybe a few others local to the Portland area, and I'll be at Fosdem at the end of the month so I can pickup a few more there. > Even without signatures, it's a fine key and validates that it's the > same person (or controlling entity) that keeps doing this, but it > would be even better if there was an actual chain of trust in addition > to the basic key. > > Linus >