Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932207AbeAHKBw (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 05:01:52 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:48994 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932089AbeAHKBu (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 05:01:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:01:41 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Linus Torvalds cc: David Woodhouse , Andi Kleen , Paul Turner , LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tim Chen , Dave Hansen , Kees Cook , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Jiri Kosina , One Thousand Gnomes Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Retpoline: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1515363085-4219-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Sun, 7 Jan 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > This is a mitigation for the 'variant 2' attack described in > > https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html > > Ok, I don't love the patches, but I see nothing horribly wrong here > either, and I assume the performance impact of this is pretty minimal. > > Thomas? I'm obviously doing rc7 today without these, but I assume the > x86 maintainers are resigned to this all. That seems to be the general mental state for lots of involved people. Thanks, tglx