MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1014111514465704@web19o.yandex.ru>
References: <CACT4Y+bkOpUyjEGUT96T4tPGFeoQ2iP8ZGoE_FMiAg3h5RKxDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171222033229.GB26818@zzz.localdomain> <CACT4Y+aXLGYw2iaocMyf-zhWao96gRw+98caemaebt-9s2DMfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <581031514458281@web9g.yandex.ru> <CACT4Y+Z-6BzFuV74d0FuZyvBCaPFf9QwQBqJFY7V2Q7=g3sYYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <503641514463979@web33o.yandex.ru> <CACT4Y+ajfndZ4PZgh3_DjYZBJ_TwV8ippt9e1YJTG-iWnTXHQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1014111514465704@web19o.yandex.ru>
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:51:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+biONncb16+NtzQ=io2-Er8j-qnKnbj5g58464AN-bRXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] syzbot process
To: Ozgur <ozgur@goosey.org>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        andreyknvl <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>,
        Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Ozgur <ozgur@goosey.org> wrote:
> 28.12.2017, 15:30, "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>:
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Ozgur <ozgur@goosey.org> wrote:
>>
>>>>>   and I think syzbot use to .txt file attached.
>>>>>   .txt is not good.
>>>>
>>>>  Why are not .txt attachments good? What do you propose to use?
>>>
>>>  I think I'm misunderstood that is good to have text output in a file but not useful if the file extension is ".txt"
>>>  Not comfortable use it for mutt / vim and diff.
>>>
>>>  I think needs to be an new extension, would be like this ".log" or ".syz" :)
>>
>> There is an fortunate limitation in the mailing system we currently
>> use -- it infers Content-Type from file extension. So if we do .syz,
>> it will do application/octet-stream.
>
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> I understand and thanks for detailed info, like it!


Double-checking the docs:
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/go/mail/mail-with-headers-attachments

We can do .diff extension for patches. .diff is a standard extension,
looks reasonable for patches and will be a one-line change.
Does .diff sound better than .txt for patches?