Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754061AbeAHRsA (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:48:00 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:9158 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752399AbeAHRr6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:47:58 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,330,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="25456775" Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:46:53 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Mike Galbraith , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 023/159] mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y Message-ID: <20180108174653.7muglyihpngxp5tl@black.fi.intel.com> References: <20171222084623.668990192@linuxfoundation.org> <20171222084625.007160464@linuxfoundation.org> <1515302062.6507.18.camel@gmx.de> <20180108160444.2ol4fvgqbxnjmlpg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180108160444.2ol4fvgqbxnjmlpg@gmail.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170714-126-deb55f (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:04:44PM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > hi Kirill, > > As Mike reported it below, your 5-level paging related upstream commit > 83e3c48729d9 and all its followup fixes: > > 83e3c48729d9: mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y > 629a359bdb0e: mm/sparsemem: Fix ARM64 boot crash when CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y > d09cfbbfa0f7: mm/sparse.c: wrong allocation for mem_section > > ... still breaks kexec - and that now regresses -stable as well. > > Given that 5-level paging now syntactically depends on having this commit, if we > fully revert this then we'll have to disable 5-level paging as well. Urghh.. Sorry about this. I'm on vacation right now. Give me a day to sort this out. -- Kirill A. Shutemov