Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932408AbeAIHNC (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 02:13:02 -0500 Received: from LGEAMRELO11.lge.com ([156.147.23.51]:51965 "EHLO lgeamrelo11.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbeAIHNB (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 02:13:01 -0500 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.126 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.227.17 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@kernel.org Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:12:58 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: "acme@kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "wangnan0@huawei.com" , "jolsa@kernel.org" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , "yao.jin@linux.intel.com" , "kernel-team@lge.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_done Message-ID: <20180109071258.GC7138@sejong> References: <1513879734-237492-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <1513879734-237492-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <20180102073343.GA8810@sejong> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537FBC61@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20180104024643.GA1400@danjae.aot.lge.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537FDC1D@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537FDC1D@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi, On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:00:03PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote: > > Hi Kan, > > > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:15:38PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:08:46AM -0800, kan.liang@intel.com wrote: > > > > > From: Kan Liang > > > > > > > > > > The direction of overwrite mode is backward. The last > > mmap__read_event > > > > > will set tail to map->prev. Need to correct the map->prev to head > > > > > which is the end of next read. > > > > > > > > Why do you update the map->prev needlessly then? I think we don't > > need it > > > > for overwrite/backward mode, right? > > > > > > The map->prev is needless only when the overwrite does really happen in > > ringbuffer. > > > In a light load system or with big ringbuffer, the unprocessed data will not > > be > > > overwritten. So it's necessary to keep an pointer to indicate the last > > position. > > > > > > Overwrite mode is backward, but the event processing is always forward. > > > So map->prev has to be updated in __read_done(). > > > > Yep, I meant that updating map->prev in every perf_mmap__read_event() > > is unnecessary for the overwrite mode. It only needs to be set in > > perf_mmap__read_done(), right? > > Right, for overwrite, only updating the map->prev in perf_mmap__read_done() > is enough. > > But for non-overwrite, we have to update map->prev. > It will be used by perf_mmap__consume() later to write the ring buffer tail. > So I specially handle the non-overwrite as below in patch 5/12. Oh I can see it in the patch 5, thanks. > + event = perf_mmap__read(map, start, end); > + > + if (!overwrite) > + map->prev = *start; > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I guess the current code might miss some events since the head can > > be > > > > different between _read_init() and _read_done(), no? > > > > > > > > > > The overwrite mode requires the ring buffer to be paused during > > processing. > > > The head is unchanged between __read_init() and __read_done(). > > > > Ah, ok then. Maybe we could read the head once, and use it during > > processing. > > Yes, it only needs to read head once for overwrite mode. > But for non-overwrite, we have to read the head in every > perf_mmap__read_event(). Because the head is floating. > The non-overwrite is specially handled in patch 5/12 as well. Right, I understand it for the non-overwrite mode. But, for the overwrite mode, my concern was that it might be possible that it reads a stale head in __read_init() (even after it paused the ring buffer) and reads an update head in __read_done(). Then it's gonna miss some records. I'm not sure whether it reads the same head in __read_init() and __read_done() by the pause. Thanks, Namhyung > + /* non-overwirte doesn't pause the ringbuffer */ > + if (!overwrite) > + end = perf_mmap__read_head(map);