Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755409AbeAILBr (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 06:01:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:34318 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755285AbeAILBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 06:01:44 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos9bU4PWBM4RmsskhS/ceQ4emXGZMBQWXWJDUf2LkauBE5wEaZCXfQCtDJ+sZWR6BEuAULM7A== Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 03:01:41 -0800 From: Yu Zhao To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Dan Streetman , Seth Jennings , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] zswap: only save zswap header if zpool is shrinkable Message-ID: <20180109110141.GA91365@google.com> References: <20180108225101.15790-1-yuzhao@google.com> <20180109044817.GB6953@jagdpanzerIV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180109044817.GB6953@jagdpanzerIV> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:48:17PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (01/08/18 14:51), Yu Zhao wrote: > [..] > > int zpool_shrink(struct zpool *zpool, unsigned int pages, > > unsigned int *reclaimed) > > { > > - return zpool->driver->shrink(zpool->pool, pages, reclaimed); > > + return zpool_shrinkable(zpool) ? > > + zpool->driver->shrink(zpool->pool, pages, reclaimed) : -EINVAL; > > } > > > > /** > > @@ -355,6 +356,20 @@ u64 zpool_get_total_size(struct zpool *zpool) > > return zpool->driver->total_size(zpool->pool); > > } > > > > +/** > > + * zpool_shrinkable() - Test if zpool is shrinkable > > + * @pool The zpool to test > > + * > > + * Zpool is only shrinkable when it's created with struct > > + * zpool_ops.evict and its driver implements struct zpool_driver.shrink. > > + * > > + * Returns: true if shrinkable; false otherwise. > > + */ > > +bool zpool_shrinkable(struct zpool *zpool) > > +{ > > + return zpool->ops && zpool->ops->evict && zpool->driver->shrink; > > +} > > just a side note, > it might be a bit confusing and maybe there is a better > name for it. zsmalloc is shrinkable (we register a shrinker > callback), but not in the way zpool defines it. Thanks. Do zpool_evictable() and zpool->driver->evict make more sense?