Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760409AbeAISrd (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:47:33 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52278 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757436AbeAISrc (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:47:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 19:47:33 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Vincent Guittot , Stephen Boyd , Rajendra Nayak , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robdclark@gmail.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, l.stach@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, nm@ti.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com, robh+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/13] drivers: Boot Constraint core Message-ID: <20180109184733.GB28273@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:03:07PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Here is V5 of the boot constraints core based on your feedback from V4. > Hope this looks better now :) > > I have tested the Hisilicon patches (again) on hikey 9660 board, IMX > stuff was earlier tested by Sascha (Pengutronix) on i.MX6 and Qualcomm > stuff was earlier tested by Rajendra (Qualcomm) on Dragonboard 410C > (This required some more patches related to display driver which > Rajendra should be sending separately later on). Can you resend this? As you can tell, I've been a bit busy for the past month or so :( And you had a few different versions of at least one of these patches, which is messy. Also, why is there no signed-off-by on the OF core patches? thanks, greg k-h