Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964996AbeAIT2o (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:28:44 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45368 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935461AbeAIT2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:28:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:28:44 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Joe Perches Cc: Valentin Vidic , David Miller , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcin Ciupak , Marcus Wolf , Simon =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sandstr=F6m?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: remove unnecessary parentheses Message-ID: <20180109192844.GB20280@kroah.com> References: <20180108173855.19366-1-Valentin.Vidic@CARNet.hr> <20180109143148.GB608@kroah.com> <1515525697.9619.100.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1515525697.9619.100.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:21:37AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 15:31 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 06:38:55PM +0100, Valentin Vidic wrote: > > > Fixes checkpatch warnings: > > > CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'mantisse != mantisse16' > > > CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'mantisse != mantisse20' > > > CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'mantisse != mantisse24' > [] > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c > [] > > > @@ -391,9 +391,9 @@ static int rf69_set_bandwidth_intern(struct spi_device *spi, u8 reg, > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > > > > - if ((mantisse != mantisse16) && > > > - (mantisse != mantisse20) && > > > - (mantisse != mantisse24)) { > > > + if (mantisse != mantisse16 && > > > + mantisse != mantisse20 && > > > + mantisse != mantisse24) { > > > > I'm getting really tired of seeing this checkpatch warning, when it's a > > major pain. > > Your idea of major pain and mine differ a bit. I don't like taking patches that cause future problems. > > Joe, can you please turn these off. Patches like this will force people > > to have to remember that != is higher precidence than &&. > > As it's not just 1 precedence level but 4 and 5, it > really shouldn't be that hard to remember. I can't remember any of them, and I should not have to. That's the point, you should not assume anyone knows the levels, code is written for developers to understand first, and the compiler second. By removing these, it doesn't do anything for the compiler, but makes the developer think longer about them. > > The original code here was just fine. > > And I don't really disagree with you. > > David Miller has a preference for the parenthesis free > style. I believe he mentioned it sometime in August 2017 > but I can't find it right now. > > Anyway, perhaps > --- > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > index d2464058ab5d..3a7499de2c2d 100755 > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > @@ -4526,7 +4526,9 @@ sub process { > } > > # check for unnecessary parentheses around comparisons in if uses > - if ($^V && $^V ge 5.10.0 && defined($stat) && > +# when !drivers/staging or the command-line uses --strict > + if (($realfile !~ m@^(?:drivers/staging/)@ || $check_orig) && > + $^V && $^V ge 5.10.0 && defined($stat) && How about only if in the networking area? I don't want to take patches for this for other parts of the kernel either, it's really useless. thanks, greg k-h