Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759515AbeAITr7 (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:47:59 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:37839 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751348AbeAITr6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 14:47:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:47:55 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: Christoph Hellwig , konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set v5 Message-ID: <20180109194755.GA7283@infradead.org> References: <20180104132419.24536-1-christian.koenig@amd.com> <20180104132919.GA7213@infradead.org> <7e470dfb-563f-2de4-7247-2949a528c6f6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7e470dfb-563f-2de4-7247-2949a528c6f6@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Christian K?nig wrote: > I perfectly agree on that, but this is for stable kernel backports. Because > of this I want to keep the footprint as low as possible. > > When your patchset to clean that up lands for 4.16 I have no problem > changing that. > > But till then I think we should just work on suppress the warning for now. Oh well. If Konrad is fine with that I'll stick it in front of my swiotlb series (the next post is going to be split) with a stable tag, so everything is well integrated.