Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752804AbeAIV1k (ORCPT <rfc822;ralf@linux-mips.org> + 1 other);
        Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:27:40 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59198 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752677AbeAIV1j (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:27:39 -0500
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4035121742
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=luto@kernel.org
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotdnkz87+NbdWQSVublaVxwXiMZzn7hfn2sJpCnOrk4yDEjcBY4SFfow8jmYo3mEN9h37mpQbS8JHqZ52WbB6g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKocOOOqoh0RcsxSK21rXqhOUfz-h6A542fN4frSMW6c+EE2Vg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17c5ebeb2e00879b0af1a9c32bf37ecdd9b9b31b.1515130397.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <CAKocOOOqoh0RcsxSK21rXqhOUfz-h6A542fN4frSMW6c+EE2Vg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:27:18 -0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CALCETrVSab=Xb4gOwfsttOrB-7RpkX0u45Y2Pk0f_8=HTr2Y5g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALCETrVSab=Xb4gOwfsttOrB-7RpkX0u45Y2Pk0f_8=HTr2Y5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] selftests/x86: Add test_vsyscall
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>> This tests that the vsyscall entries do what they're expected to do.
>> It also confirms that attempts to read the vsyscall page behave as
>> expected.
>>
>> If changes are made to the vsyscall code or its memory map handling,
>> running this test in all three of vsyscall=none, vsyscall=emulate,
>> and vsyscall=native are helpful.
>>
>> (Because it's easy, this also compares the vsyscall results to their
>>  vDSO equivalents.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> I am not cc'ed on this patch. Doesn't look like the patch is sent to everybody
> get_maintainers lists for the set of files that are changed in this patch.
>
> Please make sure to include everybody on your future kselftest patches.
>

Ok.