Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754006AbeAJNMO (ORCPT <rfc822;ralf@linux-mips.org> + 1 other);
        Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:12:14 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59538 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932630AbeAJNML (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:12:11 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:12:07 +0100
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 5/5] x86/speculation: Add basic speculation control
 code
Message-ID: <20180110131207.GL9706@redhat.com>
References: <20180110120158.GB9706@redhat.com>
 <1515586174.22302.126.camel@infradead.org>
 <20180110121755.GD9706@redhat.com>
 <1515587384.22302.132.camel@infradead.org>
 <20180110124119.GG9706@redhat.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.00.1801101343540.27010@gjva.wvxbf.pm>
 <1515588673.22302.139.camel@infradead.org>
 <20180110130202.GI9706@redhat.com>
 <20180110130551.GJ9706@redhat.com>
 <20180110131010.GK9706@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180110131010.GK9706@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:12:11 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:10:10PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> It's still incredibly faster to shutdown part of the CPU temporarily
> than to flush its internal state as a whole with IBPB. If it wouldn't
> be the case ibrs_enabled 0 ibpb_enabled 2 special mode would perform
> better (but that's only enabled by default if SPEC_CTRL is not
> available and only IBPB_SUPPORT is).

Yet another bit of perhaps useful info: if you run 100% kernel
intensive computation (i.e. only interrupts on idle task or a kernel
driver doing all in kernel) ibrs_enabled 0 ibpb_enabled 2 of course is
much faster than ibrs_enabled 1 ibpb_enabled 1. As long as you don't
have frequent ring change, ibrs_enabled 0 ibpb_enabled 2 is faster.