Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262385AbTGVNTX (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:19:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269409AbTGVNTX (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:19:23 -0400 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([80.190.48.67]:41483 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262385AbTGVNTW (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:19:22 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: 2.4.22pre6aa1 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:34:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason References: <20030717102857.GA1855@dualathlon.random> <200307180024.17523.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <20030717225002.GY1855@dualathlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20030717225002.GY1855@dualathlon.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307221427.01519.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1545 Lines: 37 On Friday 18 July 2003 00:50, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Hi Andrea, > Can you try to change include/linux/blkdev.h like this: > -#define MAX_QUEUE_SECTORS (4 << (20 - 9)) /* 4 mbytes when full sized */ > +#define MAX_QUEUE_SECTORS (16 << (20 - 9)) /* 4 mbytes when full sized */ > This will raise the queue from 4 to 16M. That is the first(/only) thing > that can explain a drop in performnace while doing contigous I/O. > However I didn't expect it to make a difference, or at least not so > relevant. > If this doesn't help at all, it might not be an elevator/blkdev thing. > At least on my machines the contigous I/O still at the same speed. well, it doesn't help at all. I/O gets more worse with that change. (8mb/s less). How can this happen? *wondering* > You also where the only one reporting a loss of performance with > elevator-lowlatency, it could be still the same problem that you've > seen at that time. The only one? Surely not. Also Con tested your elevator-lowlatency and we both saw performance degration :) > can you try with data=writeback (or ext2) or hdparm -W1 and see if you > can still see the same delta between the two kernels? (careful with -W1 > as it invalidates journaling) Yes, I'll do it later this day. Sorry for my late reply. I've been very busy. ciao, Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/