Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270863AbTGVNwo (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:52:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270847AbTGVNuK (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:50:10 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:52899 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270850AbTGVNto (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:49:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Mochel X-X-Sender: mochel@cherise To: Pavel Machek cc: Greg KH , kernel list , Subject: Re: More powermanagment hooks for pci In-Reply-To: <20030721221205.GJ436@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 19 > > I know. I'm thinking of adding power_{off,on} to the core and getting rid > > of the level parameter to the suspend/resume functions (like how I changed > > system devices). That would require an additional hook to the PCI drivers > > so that the call is propogated down to the low-level driver. If that's the > > case, then we should add both to struct pci_driver at once. > > Should I modify patch to add both? No, don't bother yet. -pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/