Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752058AbeAJVLL (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:11:11 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:55006 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750718AbeAJVLK (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:11:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 22:10:58 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse , Andi Kleen , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Turner , Andrew Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Tom Lendacky , Tim Chen , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dave Hansen , Jiri Kosina , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Fix optimize_nops() checking Message-ID: <20180110211058.bp4ymu4quwqgw2mk@pd.tnic> References: <1515568506.22302.72.camel@infradead.org> <1515578735.22302.91.camel@infradead.org> <20180110112815.mgciyf5acwacphkq@pd.tnic> <20180110201532.5jnji6ypfl6slzvb@treble> <20180110205544.k2e534nkk27lkpjc@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 01:05:08PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Any jumps *within* the alternatives should have been handled by the > assembler already. > > And jumps between the alternatives and other places? Why do they exist? Yap, I say so too, the alternatives handle everything just fine but then Woodhouse appeared... :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.