Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752963AbeAJXZc (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:25:32 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:62107 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751607AbeAJXZb (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:25:31 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,342,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="8701818" Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:21:45 -0800 From: Dongwon Kim To: Juergen Gross Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "Potrola, MateuszX" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/60] hyper_dmabuf: initial working version of hyper_dmabuf drv Message-ID: <20180110232145.GB19888@downor-Z87X-UD5H> References: <1513711816-2618-1-git-send-email-dongwon.kim@intel.com> <20171219232731.GA6497@downor-Z87X-UD5H> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:17:07AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 20/12/17 00:27, Dongwon Kim wrote: > > I forgot to include this brief information about this patch series. > > > > This patch series contains the implementation of a new device driver, > > hyper_dmabuf, which provides a method for DMA-BUF sharing across > > different OSes running on the same virtual OS platform powered by > > a hypervisor. > > Some general remarks regarding this series: > > You are starting the whole driver in drivers/xen/ and in the last patch > you move it over to drivers/dma-buf/. Why don't you use drivers/dma-buf/ > from the beginning? The same applies to e.g. patch 22 changing the > license. Please make it easier for the reviewers by not letting us > review the development history of your work. Yeah, I tried to clean up our developement history but because of dependencies among patches, I couldn't make those things clear in the first place. I will try to clean things up further. > > Please run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl on each patch and correct the issues > it is reporting. At the first glance I've seen several style problems > which I won't comment until the next round. hmm.. I ran the script only on the final version and try to fix all the issues after that. If it's required for individual patches, I will clean up every patch once again. > > Please add the maintainers as Cc:, not only the related mailing lists. > As you seem to aim supporting other hypervisors than Xen you might want > to add virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org as well. Ok, thanks! > > > Juergen