Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753558AbeAKAuU (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:50:20 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49690 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752839AbeAKAuT (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:50:19 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4094E2173D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mhiramat@kernel.org From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Alexei Starovoitov , Josef Bacik Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, Josef Bacik , Akinobu Mita Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] tracing/kprobe: bpf: Compare instruction pointer with original one Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:49:54 +0900 Message-Id: <151563179417.628.5561851664361165803.stgit@devbox> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6 In-Reply-To: <151563173430.628.5070705610243278195.stgit@devbox> References: <151563173430.628.5070705610243278195.stgit@devbox> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Compare instruction pointer with original one on the stack instead using per-cpu bpf_kprobe_override flag. This patch also consolidates reset_current_kprobe() and preempt_enable_no_resched() blocks. Those can be done in one place. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 1 - kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 21 +++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 1966ad3bf3e0..24ed6363e00f 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_call_bpf); #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE BPF_CALL_2(bpf_override_return, struct pt_regs *, regs, unsigned long, rc) { - __this_cpu_write(bpf_kprobe_override, 1); regs_set_return_value(regs, rc); arch_kprobe_override_function(regs); return 0; diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c index 3c8deb977a8b..b8c90441bc87 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c @@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ struct trace_kprobe { (offsetof(struct trace_kprobe, tp.args) + \ (sizeof(struct probe_arg) * (n))) -DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_kprobe_override); - static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_is_return(struct trace_kprobe *tk) { return tk->rp.handler != NULL; @@ -1205,6 +1203,7 @@ kprobe_perf_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs) int rctx; if (bpf_prog_array_valid(call)) { + unsigned long orig_ip = instruction_pointer(regs); int ret; ret = trace_call_bpf(call, regs); @@ -1212,12 +1211,13 @@ kprobe_perf_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs) /* * We need to check and see if we modified the pc of the * pt_regs, and if so clear the kprobe and return 1 so that we - * don't do the instruction skipping. Also reset our state so - * we are clean the next pass through. + * don't do the single stepping. + * The ftrace kprobe handler leaves it up to us to re-enable + * preemption here before returning if we've modified the ip. */ - if (__this_cpu_read(bpf_kprobe_override)) { - __this_cpu_write(bpf_kprobe_override, 0); + if (orig_ip != instruction_pointer(regs)) { reset_current_kprobe(); + preempt_enable_no_resched(); return 1; } if (!ret) @@ -1325,15 +1325,8 @@ static int kprobe_dispatcher(struct kprobe *kp, struct pt_regs *regs) if (tk->tp.flags & TP_FLAG_TRACE) kprobe_trace_func(tk, regs); #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS - if (tk->tp.flags & TP_FLAG_PROFILE) { + if (tk->tp.flags & TP_FLAG_PROFILE) ret = kprobe_perf_func(tk, regs); - /* - * The ftrace kprobe handler leaves it up to us to re-enable - * preemption here before returning if we've modified the ip. - */ - if (ret) - preempt_enable_no_resched(); - } #endif return ret; }