Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270997AbTGVTBw (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:01:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270998AbTGVTBw (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:01:52 -0400 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:45328 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270997AbTGVTBv (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:01:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:16:46 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Christoph Hellwig , James Simmons , Roman Zippel , Samuel Flory , Charles Lepple , michaelm , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vojtech@suse.cz Subject: Re: Make menuconfig broken Message-ID: <20030722191646.GB2003@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , James Simmons , Roman Zippel , Samuel Flory , Charles Lepple , michaelm , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vojtech@suse.cz References: <20030722191746.A13975@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030722191746.A13975@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 702 Lines: 19 On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > If you really want that do it a a separate make updateconfig script instead > of bloating make oldconfig. updateconfig is definetely more acceptable than bloating oldconfig. But would we end up with lots of hacks - and where do we stop. Do we want to go the whole way back to a 2.0 .config and do an acceptable .config using: make updateconfig Or is this limited to 2.4 -> 2.6? Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/