Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932445AbeAKIXv (ORCPT + 1 other); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 03:23:51 -0500 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.133]:45407 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932180AbeAKIXs (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 03:23:48 -0500 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-RL-SENDER: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SENDER-IP: 103.29.142.67 X-LOGIN-NAME: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <9d09d3d724d45c6545746d108e8e1d8e> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 From: Jeffy Chen To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jcliang@chromium.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, tfiga@chromium.org, Jeffy Chen , Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 6/9] iommu/rockchip: Fix TLB flush of secondary IOMMUs Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:22:26 +0800 Message-Id: <20180111082229.24011-7-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20180111082229.24011-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> References: <20180111082229.24011-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: From: Tomasz Figa Due to the bug in current code, only first IOMMU has the TLB lines flushed in rk_iommu_zap_lines. This patch fixes the inner loop to execute for all IOMMUs and properly flush the TLB. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen --- drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c index 6b797e085340..cfeafbf54096 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c @@ -274,19 +274,21 @@ static void rk_iommu_base_command(void __iomem *base, u32 command) { writel(command, base + RK_MMU_COMMAND); } -static void rk_iommu_zap_lines(struct rk_iommu *iommu, dma_addr_t iova, +static void rk_iommu_zap_lines(struct rk_iommu *iommu, dma_addr_t iova_start, size_t size) { int i; - - dma_addr_t iova_end = iova + size; + dma_addr_t iova_end = iova_start + size; /* * TODO(djkurtz): Figure out when it is more efficient to shootdown the * entire iotlb rather than iterate over individual iovas. */ - for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_mmu; i++) - for (; iova < iova_end; iova += SPAGE_SIZE) + for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_mmu; i++) { + dma_addr_t iova; + + for (iova = iova_start; iova < iova_end; iova += SPAGE_SIZE) rk_iommu_write(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_ZAP_ONE_LINE, iova); + } } static bool rk_iommu_is_stall_active(struct rk_iommu *iommu) -- 2.11.0