Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:32:06 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linux-foundation.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
        x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, rga@amazon.de,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit
Message-ID: <20180111143206.GA6176@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1515670638-8552-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
 <20180111142038.sqhflhikcailqnwi@treble>
 <1515680912.22302.351.camel@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1515680912.22302.351.camel@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 02:28:32PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 08:20 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > 
> > This seems weird.? I liked v1 a lot better.? What's the problem with
> > patching in the whole thing?
> > 
> > Also, if you go back to v1, it should be an easy objtool fix, just add
> > ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE in front of it.
> 
> The objection was that I was patching in a fairly long set of
> instructions. I confess I don't actually know why that's a problem,

You get a giant string of NOPs, a single jmp should be faster.