Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932818AbeAKV3Z convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 1 other); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:29:25 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:19000 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752804AbeAKV3Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:29:24 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,346,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="23331424" From: "Liang, Kan" To: Jiri Olsa CC: "acme@kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "wangnan0@huawei.com" , "jolsa@kernel.org" , "namhyung@kernel.org" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , "yao.jin@linux.intel.com" Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 08/12] perf top: check per event overwrite term Thread-Topic: [PATCH V3 08/12] perf top: check per event overwrite term Thread-Index: AQHTeohZVR6bK+Uv8UC/ikJPKdDyPaNuVPqAgADsXwA= Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:29:21 +0000 Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537FFC1F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1513879734-237492-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <1513879734-237492-9-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <20180111142549.GD16655@krava> In-Reply-To: <20180111142549.GD16655@krava> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZDgxZTllNGItNzExYS00NTNkLTk0ODEtOWUyMWZlODNmZGQ0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IjVldkNtZ0JjbWtpc2xnSUE3SHBacnVDOFJcL0lPMlNqVDZsellFZ0I0RFNFPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:08:50AM -0800, kan.liang@intel.com wrote: > > From: Kan Liang > > > > Per event overwrite term is not forbidden in perf top, which can bring > > problems. Because perf top only support non-overwrite mode. > > > > Check and forbid inconsistent per event overwrite term in the evlist. > > Make it possible to support either non-overwrite or overwrite mode. > > The overwrite mode is forbidden now, which will be removed when the > > overwrite mode is supported later. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang > > --- > > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 60 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > index c6ccda5..4b85e7b 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > @@ -881,6 +881,56 @@ static void perf_top__mmap_read(struct perf_top > *top) > > perf_top__mmap_read_idx(top, i); > > } > > > > +/* > > + * Check per event overwrite term. > > + * perf top supports consistent mode for all events. > > + * Return -1 if the per event terms set but not consistent. > > please list the rules for overwrite in the comment > are they just top specific? Yes, it's only for perf top. It doesn't support that some events are overwrite mode and other events are non-overwrite mode. I will refine the comments. > > SNIP > > > + if (evsel == perf_evlist__first(evlist)) > > + overwrite = set; > > + else > > + return -1; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if ((overwrite >= 0) && (opts->overwrite != overwrite)) > > + opts->overwrite = overwrite; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static int perf_top__start_counters(struct perf_top *top) > > { > > char msg[BUFSIZ]; > > @@ -890,6 +940,16 @@ static int perf_top__start_counters(struct > perf_top *top) > > > > perf_evlist__config(evlist, opts, &callchain_param); > > so perf_evlist__config uses opts->overwrite, which you set > in your perf_top_overwrite_check call.. I'd think you need > to call it sooner > User may set per-event mode, which is processed in perf_evlist__config It's possible that the per-event mode is not same as opts->overwrite. If so, perf_evlist__config actually uses per-event mode. perf_top_overwrite_check will do the check. If the per-event mode is inconsistent as opts->overwrite, updating the opts->overwrite. It has to be called after the perf_evlist__config. Thanks, Kan