Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:23:22 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: PM regression in next
Message-ID: <20180112002322.GB3875@atomide.com>
References: <20180112000037.GA3875@atomide.com>
 <20180111161837.f1c1d891a1b80d97e30a9b1b@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180111161837.f1c1d891a1b80d97e30a9b1b@linux-foundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [180112 00:18]:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:01:13 -0800 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I'm seeing a considerable idle power consumption regression in
> > Linux next, with power consumption for my idle test system going
> > to 17.5mW compared to the usual 8mW on my test device.
> > 
> > Git bisect points to merge commit e130bc1d00a4 ("Merge branch
> > 'akpm-current/current'") being the first bad commit.
> > 
> > I have also verified that commit 70286688e5ad ("ipc/mqueue.c:
> > have RT tasks queue in by priority in wq_add()") is good, and
> > commit e2d7fe89e8ae ("Merge remote-tracking branch
> > 'init_task/init_task'") is good.
> 
> Do you mean that everything up to and including 70286688e5ad
> ("ipc/mqueue.c: have RT tasks queue in by priority in wq_add()") is
> good?

Yes I'm not seeing the regression in your branch at commit
70286688e5ad. I'm seeing it only with the merge commit
e130bc1d00a4.

Regards,

Tony