Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:47:53 +0800
From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
        <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>, <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: KASLR may break some kernel features (was Re: [PATCH v5 1/4]
 kaslr: add immovable_mem=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG] to specify extracting memory)
Message-ID: <20180112024752.GC13719@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20180104080219.23893-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <20180104080219.23893-2-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <20180104103057.GC7235@x1>
 <20180104112104.67b88e2d@redhat.com>
 <20180111090006.GA9648@localhost.localdomain>
 <CAGXu5jJvN52-Zi_meU86G7sbzQDNRqi-6jHxz-aPfkq4vXcKoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180112023152.GB9648@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180112023152.GB9648@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:31:52AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 01/11/18 at 10:04am, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:00 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Luiz,
>> >
>> > On 01/04/18 at 11:21am, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> >> Having a generic kaslr parameter to control where the kernel is extracted
>> >> is one solution for this problem.
>> >>
>> >> The general problem statement is that KASLR may break some kernel features
>> >> depending on where the kernel is extracted. Two examples are hot-plugged
>> >> memory (this series) and 1GB HugeTLB pages.
>> >>
>> >> The 1GB HugeTLB page issue is not specific to KVM guests. It just happens
>> >> that there's a bunch of people running guests with up to 5GB of memory and
>> >> with that amount of memory you have one or two 1GB pages and is easier for
>> >> KASLR to extract the kernel into a 1GB region and split a 1GB page. So,
>> >> you may not get any 1GB pages at all when this happens. However, I can also
>> >> reproduce this on bare-metal with lots of memory where I can loose a 1GB
>> >> page from time to time.
>> >>
>> >> Having a kaslr_range= parameter solves both issues, but two major drawbacks
>> >> is that it breaks existing setups and I guess users will have a very hard
>> >> time choosing good ranges.
>> >>
>> >> Another idea would be to have a CONFIG_KASLR_RANGES, where each arch
>> >> could have a list of ranges known to contain holes and/or immovable
>> >> memory and only extract the kernel into those ranges.
>> >
>> > If add CONFIG_KASLR_RANGES, then a distro like RHEL will have this range
>> > always, whether people need hugetlb or not.
>> >
>> > So in this case, what range do we need to avoid? Only [1G, 2G]?
>> 
>> Any ranges like that that need to be avoided should be known at build
>> time, so they should simply be added to the mem_avoid list that is
>> already present in the KASLR code...
>
>Seems KASLR doesn't have an solution which allow user to specify avoided
>range for kernel text KASLR stage only. The memmap="!#$" can add range to
>mem_avoid, while it will make them not added to e820.
>

How about adding a new option, like "huge_page=nn@ss". Fill the regions
to mem_avoid. But this parameter will only be parsed in kaslr period.
The followed handlling of memmap will not be excuted.

Thanks,
Chao Fan

>Here like this hugetlb case, Luiz wants kernel to avoid the [2G, 3G)
>candidate position for hugetlb allocation, meanwhile wants it to be
>added to mm subsystem later.
>
>Thanks
>Baoquan
>
>
>