Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:13:20 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: textshell@neutronstar.dyndns.org
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>, davej@suse.de,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Henrik Persson <nix@syndicalist.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1: CPUFreq not working, can't find sysfs interface
Message-ID: <20030723111320.GB729@zaurus.ucw.cz>
References: <20030720150243.GJ2331@neutronstar.dyndns.org> <200307201745.h6KHjcHt095999@sirius.nix.badanka.com> <20030720211246.GK2331@neutronstar.dyndns.org> <20030722120811.GD1160@brodo.de> <20030722141839.GD7517@neutronstar.dyndns.org> <20030722142353.GA1301@brodo.de> <20030722145352.GE7517@neutronstar.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030722145352.GE7517@neutronstar.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 833
Lines: 21

Hi!

> I think you know a bit more about these matters than me, so please allow me this
> question:
> How much risk do you think that would be (with the usual 'you are not responible
> for any damages' stuff as usual) to just use that entry? At with the performance
> governour it is exactly the same as displayed as currently by x86info so that
> shouldn't be a problem. Do you think that lower frequencies and voltages can
> kill the processor? [I can cope with instabilities]
> 

You are not likely to kill cpu (BTDT). 
-- 
				Pavel
Hardware that lets software kill it deserved that.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/